Shanghai court postpones iPad decision

Apple is in iPad trademark dispute with Chinese company Proview Technology (Shenzhen). [File photo]

The Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Court on Thursday rejected a request by Shenzhen Proview Technology to stop Apple from selling iPads in the city.

The court said it could not support Proview's application because no ruling has been made on whether Apple has violated Proview's exclusive right to use the iPad trademark.

A lawsuit over the right to use the trademark in China is still under the second instance trial at Guangzhou people's higher court, which is scheduled to hold a hearing on Wednesday.

Xie Jinnan, a lawyer for Apple, said he was notified about the court's decision but is not authorized to make further comments on the case.

Proview's lawyers could not be reached.

Shu Jianxin, a Shanghai-based intellectual property attorney who has been closely following the case, said the Shanghai court is being cautious to wait for the Guangdong court's verdict.

The lawsuit in Guangdong will decide whether the trademark should be exclusively used by Shenzhen Proview Technology, while the case in Shanghai will decide whether the distributors of Apple products have the right to use it.

Shu said they are quite different lawsuits, but if the Guangdong court rules that Apple has no right to use the iPad trademark, then the Shanghai court might take the decision into consideration.

A legal expert said the Shanghai court's decision to suspend the case might be good news for Apple.

Liu Chuntian, professor of intellectual property at Renmin University of China, said Proview has to provide more evidence proving Apple had infringed on its trademark rights if it wants to win the suit.

In Shanghai's Apple flagship store, shop assistants said some customers have come to ask about the lawsuits, but they have not seen any changes on the sales of the iPad products these days.

"We sell as many iPads as usual and I don't think the lawsuits have impacted the sales of the products," said a shop assistant who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Read More @ Source

Alex Comments About The Catholic Churches Pedophile Case & Dyncorp's Child Sex-Slave Ring

PMC Business is Violence for Profit. Posted: Sep 3, 2009 4:02 AM forums.yaleglobal.yale.edu (17)DynCorp is a Virginia-based military contractor. DynCorp began in 1946 as a project of a small group of returning World War II pilots seeking to use their military contacts to make a living in the air cargo business. Named California Eastern Airways, the original company was soon airlifting supplies to Asia used in the Korean War. DynCorp, it turns out, is a one of the top private military contractors working for the US government. In addition to allegedly trafficking in under-age sex slaves in Bosnia (www.corpwatch.org and poisoning rural farmers in Ecuador with its aerial spraying of Colombian coca crops (www.corpwatch.org Dyncorp just happens to be paid big dollars by the US government to patrol the US / Mexico border, Since the late 1990s, The United States has paid private contractors an estimated .2 billion, both to eradicate coca crops and to assist the Colombian army put down rebels that use the illegal drug trade to finance their insurgency. DynCorp has been awarded under competitive bid more of this business than any other company (18)Edinburgh Risk EI list their offices as being in London and Guernsey (UK), Washington DC (US) Baghdad (Iraq), Kabul (Afghanistan), Khartoum (Sudan) and Dubai (United Arab Emirates). They also list "affiliate" offices as being in Kentucky, North Carolina, Florida in the US. EI also has "representative" offices in the British Virgin ...

Video Rating: 4 / 5